Welcome Guest, please login or register.
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Mayoral control bill gets Senate sponsor  (Read 206 times)

Hilary

  • Administrator
  • Very Posty
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
Mayoral control bill gets Senate sponsor
« on: June 22, 2010, 10:27:59 AM »
From City Newspaper:

State Senator Malcolm Smith has introduced and is sponsoring legislation to enact mayoral control of the Rochester school district. Smith introduced the bill at the request of Governor David Paterson.

The bill, S8156, is the same as the Assembly version that was previously introduced.

A spokesman for the Senate's Democratic majority didn't know why Smith is sponsoring the bill. Smith represents part of Queens. The two senators that represent Rochester, Republicans Joe Robach and Jim Alesi, haven't openly embraced the proposal.
                   
Logged

CoolGrrl28

  • Very Posty
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
    • View Profile
Re: Mayoral control bill gets Senate sponsor
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2010, 06:54:44 PM »
(I posted this comment on the City article's page as well.)

Is it just me, or does anyone else have a problem with this? How can a person from Queens know or understand all of the nuances that are involved in our local school district, and the many issues that are being addressed here in Rochester? If our local senators didn't jump at the chance to sponsor this bill, why did he? I really hope and pray that this bill does not get passed, so that we can simply vote democratically on any changes that we, the affected citizens, want, nay, need to make. No one is happy with the status quo of public education in our city, but I believe that we should have the same voting rights that our suburban neighbors enjoy within our same county. This would be yet another reason to sell our home, and leave the city.
Logged

Hilary

  • Administrator
  • Very Posty
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
Mayoral control legislation advances
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2010, 10:19:30 AM »
D&C story:

Legislation granting mayoral control of Rochester city schools was reported out of the Assembly’s education committee on Wednesday and now will be considered by the Ways and Means Committee.

If adopted by the full Legislature, and signed by the governor, the school governance change would take effect July 1, 2011.
Logged

Hilary

  • Administrator
  • Very Posty
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
Re: Mayoral control bill gets Senate sponsor
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2010, 02:20:38 PM »
From the School Administrators Association of New York State (SAANYS):

Mayoral Control Bill Passes Assembly Ed Committee
   
The "City of Rochester School District Governance Reform Act" has passed in the Assembly Education Committee, with opposition from Rochester Assembly members Susan John (D) and Bill Reilich (R), and has moved on to the Ways and Means Committee.

SAANYS has issued a memorandum of opposition on this bill, has delivered opposing testimony at a public hearing in Rochester, and has been in direct contact with local legislators.

Fundamentally, the proposed legislation flies in the face of its primary purported purpose: "...to provide for greater parental participation and input, transparency, and accountability in relation to the management and operation of the city school district." It would unnecessarily add to the school district's organizational architecture and add to the reports the school district is required to complete annually. Implementation of the bill would also require the redirection of current resources for the establishment of nine councils and boards and the appointment of their 51 members. Education would become more "political."

We urge you to contact the Assembly, particularly members of the Ways and Means Committee, to voice your opposition at this critical time.

Click here to view delivered testimony opposing the bill.


David F. Gantt, Ways and Means Committee

Joseph D. Morelle, Ways and Mean Committee

Find your representative

 
Logged

Hilary

  • Administrator
  • Very Posty
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
Cuomo says he supports mayoral control
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2010, 06:44:47 PM »
From WHAM:

Greece, NY --- Attorney General Andrew Cuomo now says he's making calls  on behalf of his gubernatorial running-mate, Mayor Bob Duffy.  The calls  are to state lawmakers, and the issue is mayoral control of the city's  school district.  Legislation introduced by Governor David Paterson  is pending in Albany now.  The bill calls for a change in school  governance that shifts decision-making power to City Hall and in turn  Rochester’s Mayor.  Many sources say the legislation is likely to pass  the Assembly in a floor vote, perhaps as early as this week.  But the  State Senate remains a potential obstacle and the issue could be decided  once and for all within the next two weeks.

Cuomo chose Rochester  Mayor Bob Duffy as his candidate for Lieutenant Governor last month.   Given Cuomo’s political pull in Albany as the front-runner to be New  York’s next Governor, I asked him if he was helping Mayor Duffy get the  bill passed.

Cuomo:  "I support  his plan for mayoral control.”

Reporter:  “Are you lobbying any state senators?”

Cuomo:  “I'm not really a lobbyist, do I  support the plan? Yes.”

Reporter:   “Are you calling any state senators?”

Cuomo:  “I have been talking to senators  about it, I haven't called specifically about the issue but the issue is  a big topic, not just in Rochester but across the state and I've been  talking to senators and assemblyman about it."

Later Cuomo  elaborated on his support for the issue saying it makes sense that a  city’s mayor should be the one held accountable for school performance.

Cuomo:  "The mayor's in charge, one person,  especially this mayor (Duffy) who has proven himself as an excellent  manager.”

Reporter:  “Who  won't be around if this passes, if you win?”

Cuomo:  “Yeah, but the concept is right."

Multiple  sources say the effort to pass this legislation is perhaps a half-dozen  votes short in the NY State Senate.

Raw Video of WHAM reporter Sean Carroll's exchange with Cuomo and political analysis on the  push for mayoral control can be found on the 13WHAM Reporters Blog  Page.
Logged

Elizabeth

  • Moderator
  • Very Posty
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
    • View Profile
Re: Mayoral control bill gets Senate sponsor
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2010, 09:22:08 PM »
So can we have Mayoral Control without a Mayor???
Logged
Elizabeth
Wilson & WOIS MOM

Hilary

  • Administrator
  • Very Posty
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
Rochester mayoral control bill passes Assembly
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2010, 11:01:24 PM »
From the D&C:

By an 89-40 margin, a bill that would eliminate the elected school board and install the mayor at the head of Rochester School District was approved in the state Assembly tonight.

On the strength of support from Assemblymen David Gantt, D-Rochester, and Joseph Morelle, D-Irondequoit, the bill moved rapidly through the Assembly, surviving votes in two committees before reaching the floor for a vote this evening.

But it is less clear whether it will succeed in the Senate, where Democrats hold a slim 32-30 majority in the Senate -- exactly the margin needed to pass legislation themselves.

The legislation seeks to make public schools a city department, dissolve the school board and grant oversight to the mayor and City Council. If adopted, the change in school governance would take effect July 1, 2011. But with only days remaining in the current legislative session, and state lawmakers focused on the budget, the only certain deadline Senate President Malcolm Smith D-Queens, offered for getting the bill out of committee was “probably before we leave.”

“I would like it to be done this session, but I can’t guarantee that,” Smith said.

Logged

Hilary

  • Administrator
  • Very Posty
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
Duffy holding news conference on mayoral control today
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2010, 10:13:54 AM »
More from the D&C:

Legislation proposing mayoral control of Rochester public schools passed the Assembly on Thursday, putting the focus on the state Senate — where the bill's fate is far less certain.

This is where opponents hope to defeat the measure. Local senators, all Republicans, have not stated how they intend to vote.

"Do I need them? No," said Senate President Malcolm Smith, D-Queens, who is sponsoring the bill. "Would I like to have them? Obviously."

Democrats hold a slim 32-30 majority in the Senate, exactly the margin needed to pass legislation themselves. But the immediate question is whether Smith can get the bill out of the Senate rules committee, which he chairs.

In the Assembly, the bill cleared two remaining committee votes Thursday and passed the full house in an 89 to 40 vote.

"This is probably, in my view, one of the most important votes I will ever cast, and certainly it is one of the most important votes in the city of Rochester," said Assemblyman Joseph Morelle, D-Irondequoit, who co-authored the bill with Assemblyman David Gantt, D-Rochester.

Morelle continued: "We are pleased tonight. But we know that the job is only half done."

The Assembly votes have not been along party lines, though Assemblyman and Monroe County GOP chairman William Reilich, R-Greece, voted no. As for his colleagues in the Senate: "They vote what's best for their district, regardless of how I vote. I'm not sending any message."

The legislation seeks to make public schools a city department, dissolve the school board and grant oversight to the mayor and City Council. If adopted, the change in school governance would take effect July 1, 2011. But with only days remaining in the current legislative session, and state lawmakers focused on the budget, the only certain deadline Smith offered for getting the bill out of committee was "probably before we leave.

"I would like it to be done this session, but I can't guarantee that," Smith said.

The Senate will not be holding a public hearing on the legislation. Last week's seven-hour Assembly hearing in Rochester was adequate, Smith said, noting that Senate staffers attended, and he watched some of it online.

City hearings, once promised before any state vote, have not been scheduled. A draft operations plan is being vetted, city spokesman Gary Walker said, and Mayor Robert Duffy has called a news conference for today, in part to discuss school governance reform.

Some New York City Democrats have opposed mayoral control in New York City, and Senate Republicans may be unlikely to vote for the bill for Rochester unless Republican senators who represent the city, Sens. Joseph Robach, James Alesi and George Maziarz, back it. So far, they have not.

This weekend, the Rochester Kids First coalition will launch a media campaign targeting Robach and Alesi with a series of robo-calls, said coalition member Sandy Parker, CEO and president of the Rochester Business Alliance.

"The focus is on the Senate," she said. "And, I will tell you, the focus is on two senators. ... They need to support this."

While Parker said she was celebrating Thursday evening, Adam Urbanski, president of the teachers union, said the Assembly vote was neither a surprise nor a victory.

"In the Assembly, it's been a foregone conclusion," Urbanski said. "So all along, our thoughts have always been that there would be independent minds in the New York Senate."

The bill appears to be getting a boost from Andrew Cuomo. The attorney general said this week that he has been talking to senators about the bill that Duffy, his running mate, has pushed. Duffy's candidacy alone could be a factor.

"I suspect that it could be of help in the Senate, where he could very well be the presiding officer next year," Morelle said.

"This is clearly a Bob Duffy initiative," added Maziarz, R-Newfane, Niagara County, whose district is mainly outside the city. "This is clearly a signature issue for him. Whether he says it or not, everybody down here sees it that way."

Meanwhile, Robach, R-Greece, who represents most of the city, is protesting the bill's introduction by Smith, saying New York City Democrats in the Senate are trying to usurp local residents' wishes and "dictate policy to people in Rochester."

Robach has argued that the proposal should be put to a referendum, an idea that has the support of Reilich and Maziarz. Smith and Duffy say a referendum is a delay tactic. Smith is convinced the change has public support, though estimating only a 60-40 majority.

"The people who are impacted the most — the parents, the grandparents, the taxpayers — they should be able to make this decision and know the facts prior to going into it, not Albany," Robach said this week.

"But it seems like they are trying to go around the people of Rochester and get somebody from New York City to do a bill the way they didn't like it done in their city," Robach continued, calling it "a bad precedent."

Smith explained that he sponsored the bill because the state cannot afford a poorly performing school system. The city's 46 percent on-time graduation rate is among the worst in New York.

Ultimately, Smith said, legislators should stop pitting upstate versus downstate. He noted that Robach and Alesi both voted for mayoral control in New York City.

"If you want to go there ... they chose to vote for what New York City was doing," Smith said. "What's the difference?"

BDSHARP@DemocratandChronicle.com

JSPECTOR@Gannett.com
« Last Edit: June 25, 2010, 10:17:50 AM by Hilary »
Logged

Hilary

  • Administrator
  • Very Posty
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
Duffy to lobby for mayoral control bill in Albany next week
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2010, 01:40:07 PM »
D&C story:

Mayor Robert Duffy will travel to Albany next week, where he will lobby state senators to pass a mayoral control of schools bill for Rochester, he said at a press conference today.

Flanked by community leaders outside the Auditorium Theatre, Duffy said senators must vote their conscience and not be beholden to a political party.

“If the vote goes down party lines it only reinforces the problems we have here,” Duffy said. “The politics of education have, I believe, ruined so many lives over the years.”

Duffy and members of the Rochester Kids First Coalition called the news conference for today to coincide with high school graduations in the city. They also cheered passage of the mayoral control bill by the Assembly on Thursday.

“When they walk across the stage (to get their diploma) starting tonight, this is what it’s all about.”

The legislation seeks to make the school district a city department, dissolve the school board and put the mayor and City Council in charge. In making their case, supporters point to the district’s 46 percent, four-year graduation rate.

BDSHARP@DemocratandChronicle.com
Logged

CSampson

  • Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Mayoral control bill gets Senate sponsor
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2010, 11:07:24 PM »
Even after all this time and discussion, I still am not convinced that this change will positively impact the outcomes.  I do believe that something radical needs to be done.  Giving the mayor 5 years is no different than giving elected boards their term or a superintendent his/her obligatory pause in a district while striving for higher aspirations.  There are too many negative variables in the lives of students who are not viewed as successful.  While most children/parents will stay for the 13+ years, the Mayor will change, School Board members will change, the Superintendent will change, the school configurations will change, the general philosophy about educating children will change (i.e. same sex class rooms, K-6 or k-8? k-6/7-9/10-12 or k-6/7-12, inclusion or not and on and on...).  The parents and children are always left to pick up the pieces.

As governmental entities (city, county, state and to some extent the federal government) they should (along with community agencies) be focused on things like providing youth with positive outlets outside of school to reduce teen pregnancy (just image the number of Kindergartners who will move up as their moms graduate {or not} from high school), reduce gangs, change how DSS subsidizes housing (landlords are driven to have rents too low to cover the cost of maintaining decent housing), change the foster care system, etc.

It is unfortunate the circumstances in which some children are born.  Then  we expect them to come to school, behave and learn.  If a child comes to school as a blank sheet of paper, crumbled by the harsh realities of their existence, no amount of reorganization of the power brokers will smooth the paper out or put enough information on it to catch them up to their peers who don't show up so disadvantaged.

It only gets worse when parents whose children are not so broken don't want their precious little ones around them too much past 4th grade.  So those children grow up not seeing what is possible in their crumpled state and remain hopeless unless someone steps in their lives and raise them up.  This person can not be a mayor.

Hey, lets do something really radical.  County wide school district.  hmmm...

Cheryl
Logged
~~~ Cheryl
Be Blessed and a Blessing!

Hilary

  • Administrator
  • Very Posty
  • ****
  • Posts: 2146
    • View Profile
Re: Mayoral control bill gets Senate sponsor
« Reply #10 on: June 26, 2010, 09:54:38 PM »
Amen. Thanks so much for posting that. I feel the same way -- why doesn't the government focus on things we know they CAN change -- like programs to reduce the rate of teen pregnancy, like the Nurse-Family Partnership, which addresses those all-important early years, like - for one small example - giving kids something to do after school so they don't need to hang out at Midtown and get into trouble ...

to talk about this endlessly and turn it into one more political campaign when there are things that could be done NOW to improve Rochester children's lives and prospects, without any mayoral control or governance change, is so frustrating to me ...
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »